Acer Aspire V5-571 Review

by Charles P. Jefferies Reads (198,543)
Editor's Rating
4.86

TG Ratings Breakdown

    • Software & Support
    • 6
    • Upgrade Capabilities
    • 4
    • Usability
    • 7
    • Design
    • 4
    • Performance
    • 5
    • Features
    • 4
    • Price/Value Rating
    • 4
    • Total Score:
    • 4.86
    • Rating 1 to 10, top score 10

Overview

  • Pros

    • Decent performance
    • Five hour battery life
  • Cons

    • Poor display quality
    • Fan whine
    • Feels cheap

Quick Take

The Acer Aspire V5-571 looks good in terms of specs and price but fails to deliver in terms of overall quality.


This 15.6-inch notebook is priced below $600, has a design less than one inch thin and gets over five hours of battery life. What’s not to like?

Overview

The Acer Aspire V5 series is designed to provide and thin and light computing experience at an affordable price. Despite being relatively thin, the V5-571 packs an Intel Core i5 processor, 6GB of RAM and a 500GB hard drive. The specs might not be as impressive as the latest Ultrabooks, but the V5 delivers some decent hardware for the price.

Build and Design

The Aspire V5-571 has a utilitarian exterior made of anti-glare dark gray plastic. It feels reasonbly thick but is a continuous reminder of the fact that this is a budget notebook. Design-wise there is almost nothing distinguishing save for the chassis being less than an inch thick. I’m thankful that there is no glossy plastic (save for the display surface, of course).

Build quality is average; there is limited chassis flex in the range of what we expect for consumer noteboooks. The lid flexes a bit too much; ripples appear on the back when pressure is applied from behind. Fit and finish is OK; the front corners could be more smoothly rounded off.

Upgrade capabilities are limited to just the RAM; there’s an access panel on the bottom of the chassis. Upgrading anything else including the hard drive means taking most of the chassis apart, which is a shame. The V5-571′s battery is user-replaceable, which is a refreshing change from all the thin notebooks we’re seeing with sealed-in batteries.

Input and Output Ports

The V5-571 has all of its ports situated on the left side of the chassis, a disadvantage for left-handed users. There is the usual assortment of ports including a single USB 3.0 SuperSpeed port. There are no ports on the back on the notebook and the only port on the front edge is a media card reader. The image descriptions below are listed from left to right.


Left: AC power jack, cooling exhaust vent, Ethernet (via dongle), HDMI, 2x USB 2.0, USB 3.0, headphone/microphone combo jack

Right: DVD burner, Kensington lock slot

Keyboard and Touchpad

There is a full size “Chiclet” style keyboard with a dedicated numeric keypad that isn’t all that enjoyable to type on. The tactile feedback needs to be more engaging; right now it doesn’t feel like anything but plastic. I had accuracy problems as well; there’s a chance the keystroke will not register if the keys aren’t fully depressed to the bottom of their travel. The 2/3 size keys of the numeric keypad take some getting used to. Keyboard backlighting is not available.

The Synaptics touchpad is a clickpad with no dedicated buttons; to produce a click just press the surface. The good news is that it’s oversized and has a smooth matte surface. The bad is the poor clicking action; it feels disconnected and takes too much pressure. I fortunately did not have accuracy issues.

Screen and Speakers

The V5-571 has a rank-and-file 15.6-inch display with no redeeming qualities. The 1366×768 resolution is the lowest available on a notebook and means lots of scrolling in web pages and documents, plus the inability to use two windows side-by-side; it’s a productivity damper. The glossy surface has annoying reflections from nearby light sources and is distracting. The picture quality is subpar; it has a bluish/cold hue and poor contrast; saturation needs a serious boost too.


The V5-571′s two stereo speakers have less than acceptable sound quality; it’s tinny with no bass at all. Their placement under the palm rest is not ideal either; placing hands on the keyboard to type muffles the sound further.


Pages: 1 2 3

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 Comments

|
All content posted on TechnologyGuide is granted to TechnologyGuide with electronic publishing rights in perpetuity, as all content posted on this site becomes a part of the community.