After the impressive build and design of the HP 2133 Mini-Note we expected to see a likewise impressive level of performance coming out of this tiny titan. Unfortunately, performance is one area where the Mini-Note falls short.
On paper the 1.6GHz VIA C7-M processor should provide excellent speed for general computing tasks. In reality, web pages rendered slower than expected, multi-tasking was painfully slow, and most processor-hungry applications like Photoshop or video encoding software just didn't like the VIA processor.
Our standard range of synthetic benchmark tests likewise didn't play very nice with the VIA processor and VIA Chrome 9 integrated graphics. While synthetic benchmarks don't always give you an accurate measure of a system's real-world performance, these benchmarks do give you a good idea of how the HP Mini-Note performs compared to other laptops currently on the market.
While the benchmark numbers certainly aren't "bad" it's hard to get excited about these numbers when you factor in that this configuration of the HP Mini-Note costs more than $750. With that said, let's jump into the benchmarks.
PCMark05 measures overall system performance (higher scores mean better performance):
| Notebook | PCMark05 Score |
| HP 2133 Mini-Note (1.6GHz VIA C7-M ULV) | 801 PCMarks |
| HTC Shift (800MHz Intel A110) | 891 PCMarks |
| Asus Eee PC 4G (630MHz Intel Celeron M ULV) | 908 PCMarks |
| Asus Eee PC 4G (900MHz Intel Celeron M ULV) | 1,132 PCMarks |
| Everex CloudBook (1.2GHz VIA C7-M ULV) |
612 PCMarks |
| Sony VAIO TZ (1.20GHz Intel Core 2 Duo U7600) | 2,446 PCMarks |
| Fujitsu LifeBook P7230 (1.2GHz Intel Core Solo U1400) | 1,152 PCMarks |
| Sony VAIO VGN-G11XN/B (1.33GHz Core Solo U1500) | 1,554 PCMarks |
| Toshiba Portege R500 (1.2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo U7600) | 1,839 PCMarks |
wPrime processor comparison results (lower scores mean better performance):
| Notebook / CPU | wPrime 32M time |
| HP 2133 Mini-Note (Via CV7-M ULV @ 1.6GHz) | 168.697 seconds |
| Asus Eee PC 4G (Intel Celeron M ULV @ 630MHz) | 289.156 seconds |
| Asus Eee PC 4G (Intel Celeron M ULV @ 900MHz) | 200.968 seconds |
| Everex CloudBook (VIA C7-M ULV @ 1.2GHz) | 248.705 seconds |
| Fujitsu U810 Tablet PC (Intel A110 @ 800MHz) |
209.980 seconds |
| Sony VAIO VGN-G11XN/B (Core Solo U1500 @ 1.33GHz) | 124.581 seconds |
| Sony VAIO TZ (Core 2 Duo U7600 @ 1.2GHz) | 76.240 seconds |
| Dell Inspiron 2650 (Pentium 4 Mobile @ 1.6GHz) | 231.714 seconds |
3DMark06 comparison results for graphics performance (higher scores are better):
| Notebook | 3DMark06 Score |
| HP 2133 Mini-Note (1.6GHz VIA C7-M ULV, VIA Chrome 9) | 93 3DMarks |
| Averatec 2575 (2.2 GHz AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64, ATI RS690T) | 377 3DMarks |
| Dell Inspiron 1525 (2.0GHz Intel T7250, Intel X3100) |
545 3DMarks |
| Sony VAIO NR (1.5GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T5250, Intel X3100) |
504 3DMarks |
| Dell XPS M1530 (2.20GHz Intel T7500, Nvidia 8600M GT 256MB) | 4,332 3DMarks |
| Dell Inspiron 1520 (2.0GHz Intel T7300, NVIDIA 8600M GT) | 2,905 3DMarks |
| Dell XPS M1330 (2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, NVIDIA GeForce Go 8400M GS 128MB) | 1,408 3DMarks |
| Samsung Q70 (2.0GHz Core 2 Duo T7300 and nVidia 8400M G GPU) | 1,069 3DMarks |
| Asus F3sv-A1 (Core 2 Duo T7300 2.0GHz, Nvidia 8600M GS 256MB) | 2,344 3DMarks |
| Alienware Area 51 m5550 (2.33GHz Core 2 Duo, nVidia GeForce Go 7600 256MB | 2,183 3DMarks |
| Fujitsu Siemens Amilo Xi 1526 (1.66GHz Core Duo, nVidia 7600Go 256 MB) | 2,144 3DMarks |
| Samsung X60plus (2.0GHz Core 2 Duo T7200, ATI X1700 256MB) | 1,831 3DMarks |
| Asus A6J (1.83GHz Core Duo, ATI X1600 128MB) | 1,819 3DMarks |
| HP dv6000t (2.16 GHz Intel T7400, NVIDA GeForce Go 7400) | 827 3DMarks |
HDTune hard drive performance results:

(view large image)
Another factor to keep in mind when judging the overall system performance is the operating system being used. Our pre-production review unit was using Windows Vista Business and, like most notebooks using Windows Vista, performance likely suffers as a result. Here is a short video comparing the startup time of the HP Mini-Note with Vista against the Asus Eee PC with XP:
While you may argue our justification for comparing a notebook with Vista against a notebook with XP, this is a valid comparison because it demonstrates what consumers will experience "out of the box" with two notebooks targeted at similar customers.
Audio
The built-in speaker performance on the Mini-Note was quite superior compared to other notebooks in this class. The audio is excellent for watching short video clips or web conferencing, but it's also loud enough to enjoy music or full-length movies with distortion-free sound using the built-in speakers.

(view large image)
Of course, for the best possible audio performance you'll want to use external speakers or headphones. The audio output via the headphone jack is quite good and provides excellent, distortion-free sound for headphones or external speakers.
Heat and Noise
The ultra low voltage VIA processor in the HP 2133 Mini-Note generated far more heat than we typically expect from ultra low voltage processors. Temperature readings taken from the outside of the aluminum and plastic chassis spiked above 110 degrees Fahrenheit in multiple locations and the Mini-Note actually became uncomfortable to hold after 30-45 minutes of serious use.
The cooling fan ran at full speed most of the time and clearly struggled to keep temperatures under control. Most of the time the fan is only loud enough to hear in a perfectly quiet environment, but if you work in a relatively quiet office or classroom setting you should be prepared for coworkers and students to complain about the noise coming from the cooling fan.
Below are images indicating the temperature readings from the HP 2133 Mini-Note (listed in degrees Fahrenheit) taken inside our office where the ambient temperature was 75 degrees Fahrenheit:
![]() (view large image) |
![]() (view large image) |
Battery
Overall, the HP 2133 Mini-Note did a reasonable job in terms of power management. With the Mini-Note connected to a Wi-Fi network and browsing the web on the "balanced" power setting with the display at about 50 percent brightness, we obtained 2 hours and 15 minutes of battery life with the standard 3-cell battery. Using the same settings we obtained 4 hours and 11 minutes of battery life with the 6-cell extended life battery.
Bottom line, the Mini-Note makes an excellent mobile companion with the extended life battery. The only possible negative to using the extended life battery is that the larger 6-cell battery sticks out from the bottom of the notebook adding both size and weight. However, this also provides an advantage since it provides a more ergonomic angle to the keyboard for typing.
![]() (view large image) |
![]() (view large image) |
Conclusion
The HP 2133 Mini-Note is one of the most impressive subnotebooks we've ever seen. Unfortunately, the amazing design and solid range of features are diminished by a sub-par processor and a price tag that places this notebook dangerously close to far superior 12-inch notebooks such as the HP tx2000.
HP managed to create the single most impressive ultraportable notebook on the market ... and then decided to put a lackluster processor inside.
Despite the poor processor performance, the HP 2133 Mini-Note is a remarkably solid machine that could be a perfect fit for students, teachers, or mobile business professionals. If HP decides to replace the VIA processors with the new Intel Atom processors or alternative processors from Intel, the Mini-Note would become the undisputed champion of the subnotebook market.
Pros
Cons
|
|
|
|
|
TechTarget publishes
more than 100 focused websites providing quick access to a deep store of
news, advice and analysis about the technologies, products and processes crucial
to the jobs of IT pros.
All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2013, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Statement